On 5 Dec 2002 at 15:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org> writes:
> >> You can do that now.
> >> ALTER TABLE <table> ADD CONSTRAINT <const> FOREIGN KEY ....
>
> > That I know. That syntax is radically different from that proposed.
>
> So you're proposing we replace a SQL-spec-compliant syntax with one
> that is not? Why?
If it's not compliant, I withdraw.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/