Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
Date: 2002-12-04 06:48:14
Message-ID: 3DEDF286.5309.8576FB1@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 3 Dec 2002 at 22:38, David Garamond wrote:
> well, i agree with you that postgresql is stable and solid. one of my
> biggest gripes with postgresql is that it's not "lightweight" or
> "simple" enough. some things are awkward/a chore to do in postgresql,
> while simple in other dbms's. in mysql, i can shut down mysqld, copy the
> database directory to another installation, and be done with it. ms

And why it will not work with postgresql? Shutdown the database, backup the
data directory and restart with another option.

Just because you can backup database online does not mean you can not do a off-
line backup.

Correct me if I am wrong..

Bye
Shridhar

--
Campbell's Law: Nature abhors a vacuous experimenter.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Madhavi 2002-12-04 06:48:49 select refcursor into a variable
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-12-04 06:00:37 Re: schemas and backups