| From: | pginfo <pginfo(at)t1(dot)unisoftbg(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc(at)mega-bucks(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "Dennis Bjrklund" <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg and number of parameters by insert |
| Date: | 2002-12-04 10:34:37 |
| Message-ID: | 3DEDDA3D.964F1430@t1.unisoftbg.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> Dennis Björklund wrote:
> >
> > It's the same resom that if you have a C function taking two
> arguments and
> > you try to call it with one you get an error.
>
> Aaaahhhh, I see the light.
>
Sarry my english is bad and I can to explain the problem ( I am speaking good
German ).
> I completely agree with you that it would be nice to get a warning.
No, it shold be error, it is not warning.
>
>
> What do the SQL specs have to say about this? Maybe it's not an error
> because the specs require it not to be an error? (I have no idea, just
> asking)
>
> If the specs don't say either way, then a warning would be nice, and an
> error better. But I bet that throwing an error would break a lot of apps ;)
>
No, it will help to correct many apps not to break.(Sorry).
> Jc
ivan.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Beutin | 2002-12-04 10:48:35 | Re: problem starting postgresql i.e postmaster |
| Previous Message | pginfo | 2002-12-04 10:32:01 | Re: pg and number of parameters by insert |