Re: Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone?

From: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone?
Date: 2002-12-03 13:01:24
Message-ID: 3DECAB24.7080607@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com wrote:

>>I've looked long and hard and can't find any license issues. Does anyone
>>know of any that I may have missed? As far as I can see, as long as I
>>maintain GPL restrictions, I should be fine.
>>
>>
>
>PostgreSQL isn't licensed under the GPL, so it sounds to me as though you're
>confused about the licensing issues.
>
I'm not confused about the licensing issues. PostgreSQL is less
restrictive than is GPL. Maybe I should have phrased it as the most
restrictive license is GPL, so as long as I maintain GPL restrictions I
should be fine.

>--
>(concatenate 'string "cbbrowne" "@cbbrowne.com")
>http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/lsf.html
>"My mom said she learned how to swim. Someone took her out in the lake
>and threw her off the boat. That's how she learned how to swim. I
>said, 'Mom, they weren't trying to teach you how to swim.' "
>-- Paula Poundstone
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Naeslund(f) 2002-12-03 14:52:57 Backend crash with tsearch
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-12-03 12:46:37 Re: Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone?