Re: Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations
Date: 2017-09-25 16:47:05
Message-ID: 3DD93508-8419-4006-B7C9-D3E85B5AC2EA@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/24/17, 10:12 PM, "Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached is a proposal of patch.

The patch seems reasonable to me, and I haven't encountered any issues in
my tests, even after applying the vacuum-multiple-relations patch on top
of it.

+ * Take a lock here for the relation lookup. If ANALYZE or VACUUM spawn
+ * multiple transactions, the lock taken here will be gone once the
+ * current transaction running commits, which could cause the relation
+ * to be gone, or the RangeVar might not refer to the OID looked up here.

I think this could be slightly misleading. Perhaps it would be more
accurate to say that the lock will be gone any time vacuum() creates a new
transaction (either in vacuum_rel() or when use_own_xacts is true).

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Hernandez 2017-09-25 16:48:05 Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-09-25 16:39:47 Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output