Re: [Fwd: [pgsql-www] Finishing the Portal]

I try to work already on the missing parts.
Takes a little bit time. :-)

But I think at the moment there are few people who work on that.
So the better way to do documentation and that stuff is a docparser of
the scourcefiles.

Regards Ewald

Robert Treat schrieb:

>On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 10:54, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
>>>Sent: 11 November 2002 15:46
>>>To: Vince Vielhaber
>>>Cc: Justin Clift; PostgreSQL Advocacy Mailing List; Dave
>>>Page; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing list
>>>Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [Fwd: [pgsql-www] Finishing the Portal]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I only suggested it because if we're going to have multiple
>>>developers doing support, we need some type of collaborative
>>>structure in place. If we can get the thing done in a few
>>>days by skipping the collaborative structure then by all
>>>means lets skip it and *get it done*. After that we can flame
>>>war ourselves on whether it should be open source, have
>>>multiple developers, use sourceforge, or whatever. Dave, in
>>>your opinion, whats the best way to tackle getting it done?
>>>
>>>
>>Honestly? I think it's a few hours work for one person, assuming there
>>are no more design changes etc. At most it maybe warrants adding to a
>>cvs someplace (I believe there is one for the web stuff isn't there
>>Vince?). I agree with Vince (now there's a first :-) ) - Gborg is
>>serious overkill.
>>
>>Regards, Dave.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Well, ok then. It is php/sql work right? You can send me the files or
>send them to Ewald unless there is a better way to get at them, and if
>so just send that to the respective developer and we can get on it.
>
>Robert Treat
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
>
>