From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Diogo Biazus <diogo(at)ikono(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy Mailing List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | [Fwd: Urgent request for a PostgreSQL contact from advocacy.postgresql.org] |
Date: | 2002-11-04 23:29:40 |
Message-ID: | 3DC702E4.F30A4694@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi Diogo,
Just received this through the Advocacy site request form.
Used Altavista's Babelfish to translate it, and it seems like Ricardo is
asking if we support databases greater than 100GB. Is this the correct
meaning of what he's asking?
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Urgent request for a PostgreSQL contact from
advocacy.postgresql.org
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:20:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Advocacy Website <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: justin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Ricardo has requested to be contacted in regards to PostgreSQL.
Email address : linuxcracker(at)globo(dot)com
Preferred language : Portugues
The nature of the request : Cases de Empresas com bases maiores que 100g
em Postgresql\.
E se o Postgresql suporta essa quantidade de dados
Grato
Ricardo
The region of the requester :
The name of the requester's company :
The number of people in the requester's company : 5000
The urgency of the request is : 4
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-11-05 04:22:02 | Re: Press release for 7.3 |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2002-11-04 17:04:08 | Press release for 7.3 |