From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Advocacy Mailing List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is is worth organising a |
Date: | 2002-11-01 07:42:07 |
Message-ID: | 3DC27DA7.17918.8848EC7@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 1 Nov 2002 at 8:17, Nicolas Pettiaux wrote:
> Le Vendredi 1 Novembre 2002 07:59, Shridhar Daithankar a écrit :
> Good
>
> Reading it again, I think we need links to using postgresql in office
> applications for example with odbc links to staroffice or better openoffice.
>
> One application that is often considered missing in the office space is a
> equivalent to M$ Access.
>
> For me the combinaison; OOo + Pgsql offers many of the desired features
> (included a true DB backend that M$ Access lacks)
>
> Having a aplication used by office users can rapidly leads to a large adoption
Agreed. I have a linux box here and my workstation is XP. Will give it a shot
and come out with step by step guide to get things done. I am not sure I will
be able to do that for unixODBC, at least for the moment.
Will keep you guys posted.
Bye
Shridhar
--
It would be illogical to assume that all conditions remain stable. -- Spock,
"The Enterprise" Incident", stardate 5027.3
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-11-01 07:48:27 | Re: Is is worth organising a |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-11-01 07:28:51 | Re: Is is worth organising a |