Re: float output precision questions

From: "Pedro M(dot) Ferreira" <pfrazao(at)ualg(dot)pt>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: float output precision questions
Date: 2002-10-31 14:48:53
Message-ID: 3DC142D5.6050006@ualg.pt
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:

> Yes agree (or double_significant_digits or format_double_digits ?),
> but default to DBL_DIG and allow range between 1 and DBL_DIG + 3.
> format_* could be used for all future output format tweaks.
>
> Unfortunately %A is not portable :-(

What do you mean ?
It is C99, introduced in glibc 2.1.

What are the requirements for PostgreSQL ?

Pedro

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2002-10-31 14:54:02 setuid for defaults, constraints and triggers (Was: What user to [sic] defaults execute as?)
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2002-10-31 14:28:48 Re: float output precision questions