| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marcin Owsiany <marcin(at)owsiany(dot)pl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Security implications of (plpgsql) functions |
| Date: | 2002-10-21 16:20:36 |
| Message-ID: | 3DB42954.3030209@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> A depth limit for PL-function recursion is perhaps feasible, but I can't
> say that I care for it a whole lot ... anyone have better ideas?
>
Is there any way to recognize infinite recursion by analyzing the saved
execution tree -- i.e. can we assume that a function that calls itself, with
the same arguments with which it was called, constitutes infinite recursion?
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ericson Smith | 2002-10-21 16:21:59 | Re: Numerous postmaster processes after upgrading to 7.2.3 |
| Previous Message | Harald Fuchs | 2002-10-21 16:13:58 | Re: referential integrity violation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Olivier PRENANT | 2002-10-21 16:23:53 | Re: Please help |
| Previous Message | Jeffrey Bohmer | 2002-10-21 16:08:52 | Re: Buffers and MacOS X |