Re: Pg 7.2.3 int8 value out of range

From: Brian Macy <bmacy(at)macykids(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pg 7.2.3 int8 value out of range
Date: 2002-10-18 17:41:09
Message-ID: 3DB047B5.60000@macykids.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

The config.log wasn't very useful but I hacked configure to not send
compile/run errors to /dev/null and got this:

checking whether long long int is 64 bits... ./conftest: relocation
error: ./conftest: undefined symbol: __muldi3

Apparrently something is whacked when running from configure. I can take
the exact code (minus the confdefs.h) and run it from the command-line
and it compiles, links, and executes fine (returns 0).

[] config.log:
configure:7610: checking whether long long int is 64 bits
configure:7648: gcc -o conftest -O2 conftest.c -lssl -lcrypto -lz
-lcrypt -lresolv -lnsl -ldl -lm 1>&5
configure: failed program was:
#line 7619 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
typedef long long int int64;

/*
* These are globals to discourage the compiler from folding all the
* arithmetic tests down to compile-time constants.
*/
int64 a = 20000001;
int64 b = 40000005;

int does_int64_work()
{
int64 c,d;

if (sizeof(int64) != 8)
return 0; /* definitely not the right size */

/* Do perfunctory checks to see if 64-bit arithmetic seems to work */
c = a * b;
d = (c + b) / b;
if (d != a+1)
return 0;
return 1;
}
main() {
exit(! does_int64_work());
}

Tom Lane wrote:
> Brian Macy <bmacy(at)macykids(dot)net> writes:
>
>>checking whether long int is 64 bits... no
>>checking whether long long int is 64 bits... no
>
>
> Well, that seems to be the problem. Perhaps the relevant section of
> config.log would offer some hints?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-18 18:59:55 Re: Pg 7.2.3 int8 value out of range
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-18 14:02:08 Re: Bug #800: Bad free in function PQclear