From: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Yury Bokhoncovich <byg(at)center-f1(dot)ru>, Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, Roland Roberts <roland(at)astrofoto(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please... |
Date: | 2002-10-02 15:29:29 |
Message-ID: | 3D9B10D9.2070208@mascari.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Mike Mascari wrote:
>>
>>Oracle isn't processing those statements interactively. SQL*Plus
>>is waiting on the "/" to send the PL/SQL block to the database.
>>I suspect its not going to take Oracle more than a second to
>>insert a row...
>
>
> Oh, I understand now. He delayed when entering the function body, but
> that has no effect when he sends it. Can someone add an explicit sleep
> in the function body and try that?
>
SQL> create table foo (a date);
Table created.
SQL> begin
2 insert into foo select sysdate from dual;
3 dbms_lock.sleep(5);
4 insert into foo select sysdate from dual;
5 end;
6 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select to_char(a, 'HH24:MI:SS') from foo;
TO_CHAR(
--------
11:31:02
11:31:07
Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2002-10-02 15:34:21 | Re: Release of 7.2.3 |
Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2002-10-02 15:14:46 | Release of 7.2.3 |