From: | Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc(at)mega-bucks(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: IN vs EXIIST |
Date: | 2002-09-19 07:49:11 |
Message-ID: | 3D898177.2070001@mega-bucks.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bill Gribble wrote:
>I just did this today for a query and got a 200x speedup when
>converting from IN to EXISTS. It's dependent on your specific query
>exactly how to do the conversion, but generally it's just a question
of >moving a field from the "outside" to the "inside" of the subselect.
If it's not asking too much could you recommend how I could fix this
query? It's a bit more complicated than yours and I can't seem to get
the syntax right.
select distinct invoice_id from invoice_li where received='true'
AND shipped='false' AND cancelled='false'
AND
(invoice_id not in
(
select distinct invoice_id from invoice_li where received='false'
AND cancelled='false'
)
OR ship_now='true'
)
Sorry for the formatting ...
Jc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Christian Imbeault | 2002-09-19 07:58:47 | datetime(): Where is it in the docs? |
Previous Message | Wim | 2002-09-19 05:57:31 | Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump! |