| From: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)stack(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: contrib/ intarray, ltree, intagg broken(?) by array |
| Date: | 2002-09-09 11:27:38 |
| Message-ID: | 3D7C85AA.4070607@stack.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> intarray and ltree both seem to be mapping their own declarations onto
> arrays using largely-similar code. But while intarray fails its
> regression test, I find ltree still passes. So I'm confused about what
> that code is really doing and don't want to touch it.
Please, apply attached patch, it solves the problem.
--
Teodor Sigaev
teodor(at)stack(dot)net
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| intarray_patch.gz | application/gzip | 384 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2002-09-09 11:31:39 | pg_dump problems in upgrading |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-09-09 10:52:46 | Re: Script to compute random page cost |