| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch |
| Date: | 2002-08-30 01:29:45 |
| Message-ID: | 3D6ECA89.60800@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>It seemed to me that pgstattuple.c does not really want to be an SRF,
>>but only a function returning a single tuple.
>
> Thank you for modifying pgstattuple.c. You are right, it does not want
> to return more than 1 tuple.
>
I noticed that too, but it did occur to me that at some point you might
want to make the function return a row for every table in a database.
Perhaps even another system view (like pg_locks or pg_settings)?
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-30 02:01:53 | RULE regression test failure |
| Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2002-08-30 01:28:08 | Re: Type definition process (was Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-30 04:29:49 | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-08-30 01:25:48 | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch |