Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in
Date: 2002-08-21 04:09:58
Message-ID: 3D631296.242ADFA4@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

...
> So I think that fixing the opaque problems in 7.2.x is simply
> impossible. Given that, the question is whether we should make a 7.2.2
> release with fixes for the other security holes (lpad(), rpad(),
> reverse(), and the datetime overruns). IMHO, we should.

Just a minor point: can someone actually show a symptom with date/time
problems in 7.2.x?

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-21 05:30:32 Re: Proposal: make "opaque" obsolete
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-08-21 03:34:53 Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in