Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function
Date: 2002-08-14 06:31:17
Message-ID: 3D59F935.1090609@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
>>I'm planning to take on the replace function next.
> Isn't Gavin on that already?

No, sorry for the confusion. I meant:

replace(bigstring, substr, newsubstr)

which I discussed (mainly with with Thomas) a few weeks ago. This
current work was a warmup, since I wasn't comfortable with MB character
handling, and noticed some issues whilst studying it.

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mario Weilguni 2002-08-14 08:01:17 Re: oid2name reports much fewer files...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-14 06:23:42 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2002-08-14 06:51:38 anoncvs - here we go again!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-14 06:23:42 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-14 14:03:30 Re: Documentation update (pg_get_fkeydef, current_database)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-14 06:23:42 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function