Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: PostgresSQL General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS
Date: 2002-08-13 08:42:29
Message-ID: 3D58C675.6070806@slingshot.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

>On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 09:21:07AM -0500, Greg Copeland wrote:
>
>>I'm actually amazed that postgres isn't already using large file
>>support. Especially for tools like dump.
>>
>
>Except it would only cause confusion if you ran such a program on a
>system that didn't itself have largefile support. Better to make the
>admin turn all these things on on purpose, until everyone is running
>64 bit systems everywhere.
>
>A
>
Ah yes ... extremely good point - I had not considered that.

I am pretty sure all reasonably current (kernel >= 2.4) Linux distros
support largefile out of the box - so it should be safe for them.

Other operating systems where 64 bit file access can be disabled or
unconfigured require more care - possibly (sigh) 2 binary RPMS with a
distinctive 32 and 64 bit label ...(I think the "big O" does this for
Solaris).

Cheers

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2002-08-13 08:43:55 Re: Slow deletes
Previous Message Sam Liddicott 2002-08-13 08:29:25 Re: Startup death!

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2002-08-13 09:28:03 Is contrib/rserv/Makefile broken?
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2002-08-13 07:06:05 Re: [HACKERS] SQL99 CONVERT() function