From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Ralph Graulich <maillist(at)shauny(dot)de> |
Cc: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
Date: | 2002-08-10 05:25:25 |
Message-ID: | 3D54A3C5.90802@slingshot.co.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Ralph Graulich wrote:
>Hi,
>
>just my two cents worth: I like having the files sized in a way I can
>handle them easily with any UNIX tool on nearly any system. No matter
>wether I want to cp, tar, dump, dd, cat or gzip the file: Just keep it at
>a maximum size below any limits, handy for handling.
>
Good point... however I was thinking that being able to dump the entire
database without resporting to "gzips and splits" was handy...
>
>For example, Oracle suggests it somewhere in their documentation, to keep
>datafiles at a reasonable size, e.g. 1 GB. Seems right to me, never had
>any problems with it.
>
Yep, fixed or controlled sizes for data files is great... I was thinking
about databases rather than data files (altho I may not have made that
clear in my mail)
best wishes
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2002-08-10 05:32:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2002-08-10 05:13:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2002-08-10 05:32:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-10 05:16:20 | Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TEMP TABLE .... ON COMMIT |