Re: AS keyword

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Steve Lane <slane(at)fmpro(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AS keyword
Date: 2002-08-10 02:02:07
Message-ID: 3D54741F.8040903@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Steve Lane wrote:
> Hello all:
>
> I thought I had understood that the AS keyword for column aliasing was
> optional in SQL. Yet it appears that, at least some of the time, it's
> necessary in Postgresql. Have I misunderstood the standard, or does postgres
> deliberately diverge?

PostgreSQL intentionally diverges. See (near the bottom - SQL92 heading):

http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?sql-select.html

Joe

In response to

  • AS keyword at 2002-08-10 01:52:38 from Steve Lane

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2002-08-10 03:00:27 Re: Transactions in functions ( was Re: transactions, serial ids, and JDBC)
Previous Message Steve Lane 2002-08-10 01:52:38 AS keyword