Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka
Date: 2002-08-05 00:47:51
Message-ID: 3D4DCB37.2050201@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Right now the last thing we need is more CVS churn. Let's see if it can
> be fixed. Joe, you need to reconsider the relationship between alias
> clauses and this feature, and also reconsider checking of the types.

OK, I'm on it now. Sorry I missed those issues. I guess my own testing
was too myopic :(

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2002-08-05 00:49:21 Re: HASH: Out of overflow pages. Out of luck
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-05 00:41:37 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-08-05 00:49:10 doc typo fix
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-05 00:41:37 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)