Re: WAL file location

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL file location
Date: 2002-07-31 06:13:38
Message-ID: 3D478012.A7EABB93@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

...
> Agreed. Consistency argues for the postgresql.conf solution, not
> security. Also, I would like to see initlocation removed as soon as we
> get a 100% functional replacement. We have fielded too many questions
> about how to set it up.

Hmm. I'm not sure the best way to look, but I was able to find three or
four questions since 1999 on the mailing lists (used "initlocation
problem help"; most other choices got lots of false hits).

And they do seem to sometimes involve the inability to type commands or
to define environment variables. I'll avoid the snide remarks about DBAs
who don't know an envar from a hole in the wall (oops...). This day of
sarcasm is getting sort of fun. Can't wait to take a shower and move on
to a more polite tomorrow though ;)

btw, a "100% functional replacement" is escaping definition so far. The
"no envar" camp has not thought through the issues yet, though the
issues can be found in the threads. Better to decide what the
requirements are before throwing out the solution.

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-07-31 06:17:50 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-07-31 06:00:52 Re: WAL file location