From: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Leif B(dot) Kristensen" <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: top posting (was: Hijack!) |
Date: | 2007-12-11 18:19:51 |
Message-ID: | 3D43E143-EFCC-4403-88E6-C7CB46F7F967@myemma.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Dec 11, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 11:41 AM, Leif B. Kristensen <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org>
> wrote:
>>
>> It certainly isn't a crime. But it's a bit like thread hijacking
>> in the
>> sense that a well-formed inline posting is more likely to attract
>> intelligent replies. I don't think that I'm the only one who tends to
>> skip top posting replies on mailing lists.
>
> You're certainly not. I can't tell you how many times I've carefully
> replied to someone with inline quoting, only to get some top post
> response. I then ask them politely not to top post, fix the format,
> reply, and get another top post reponse.
>
> At that point I just move on to the next thread.
The funniest is when that second top post response is "What's a top
post?"
Erik Jones
Software Developer | Emma®
erik(at)myemma(dot)com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)
Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stanislav Raskin | 2007-12-11 18:31:37 | Re: Understanding Aliases |
Previous Message | Harald Armin Massa | 2007-12-11 18:17:30 | Re: Understanding Aliases |