Re: top posting (was: Hijack!)

From: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Leif B(dot) Kristensen" <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: top posting (was: Hijack!)
Date: 2007-12-11 18:19:51
Message-ID: 3D43E143-EFCC-4403-88E6-C7CB46F7F967@myemma.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Dec 11, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> On Dec 11, 2007 11:41 AM, Leif B. Kristensen <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org>
> wrote:
>>
>> It certainly isn't a crime. But it's a bit like thread hijacking
>> in the
>> sense that a well-formed inline posting is more likely to attract
>> intelligent replies. I don't think that I'm the only one who tends to
>> skip top posting replies on mailing lists.
>
> You're certainly not. I can't tell you how many times I've carefully
> replied to someone with inline quoting, only to get some top post
> response. I then ask them politely not to top post, fix the format,
> reply, and get another top post reponse.
>
> At that point I just move on to the next thread.

The funniest is when that second top post response is "What's a top
post?"

Erik Jones

Software Developer | Emma®
erik(at)myemma(dot)com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stanislav Raskin 2007-12-11 18:31:37 Re: Understanding Aliases
Previous Message Harald Armin Massa 2007-12-11 18:17:30 Re: Understanding Aliases