Re: Linux max on shared buffers?

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, GB Clark <postgres(at)vsservices(dot)com>, glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Linux max on shared buffers?
Date: 2002-07-23 14:23:34
Message-ID: 3D3D66E6.21410453@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 07:52:56AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> >
> > No resource limit on that? So my 200 backends all map some random
> > 16,000 blocks from 400 files and the kernel jiggles with it like
> > it's never did anything else?
>
> My machine here is idling not doing much and the kernel is managing 53
> processes with 223 open files currently caching some 52,000 blocks and 1140
> mmap()ed areas. I'm sure if I actually did some work I could make that much
> higher.
>
> In short, if you have a machine capable of running 200 backends, I wouldn't
> be surprised if the kernel wasn't already managing that kind of load.
> Remember, brk() is really just a special kind of mmap().

Okay,

I'm running out of arguments here. So where is the patch?

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-07-23 14:32:08 Re: High availibility with PostgreSQL
Previous Message Barry Lind 2002-07-23 14:17:06 Re: Difficulty updating TEXT fields with JDBC.