From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(dot)wheeler(at)pgexperts(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New PGXN Extension site |
Date: | 2010-06-15 20:25:33 |
Message-ID: | 3D37A9A3-5DA3-4EE9-A98A-3FB6A2B5CD34@pgexperts.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Jun 15, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This was just posted to announce. Seems the community now has to
> compete with another extension-based infrastructure if we ever get
> around to developing one of our own.
>
> I personally had no knowledge of this, which is fine, but don't expect
> me to get excited about it, except to consider it a threat to a
> community-lead extension site.
This *is* for the community, Bruce. There was extensive discussion of my original proposal back in January:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org/msg143645.html
I welcome all contributions from the community. I want it to be a success for PostgreSQL. But note that it doesn't have to be started as a -hackers project (any more than pg_upgrade did). CPAN, for example, was created because Jarkko had an itch. He scratched it. I'm doing the same here.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-06-15 20:35:41 | Re: New PGXN Extension site |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-06-15 20:12:55 | New PGXN Extension site |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-06-15 20:35:41 | Re: New PGXN Extension site |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-06-15 20:12:55 | New PGXN Extension site |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-06-15 20:35:41 | Re: New PGXN Extension site |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-06-15 20:12:55 | New PGXN Extension site |