Re: DROP COLUMN

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DROP COLUMN
Date: 2002-07-17 05:26:18
Message-ID: 3D34FFFA.4674912C@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > Have I ever mentioned that negative attno's is better
> > than the attisdropped flag implemetation in the handling
> > of gaps in attnums ?
>
> How so? I don't see any improvement ...

Sorry please ignore my above words if it has no meanig to you.

My comments about this item always seem to be misunderstood.
I've never intended to persist that my trial work using
negative attno's was better than the attisdropped implementa-
tion. I've only intended to guard my work from being evaluated
unfairly. In my feeling you evaluated my work unfairly without
any verfication twice. I've protected againast you about it
each time but never got your explicit reply. Or have I missed
your reply ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-17 05:29:26 Re: Do we still need these NOTICEs?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-17 05:25:53 Re: Issues Outstanding for Point In Time Recovery (PITR)