Table Function API patch (was Re: another SRF question)

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:52:24PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
>>Nice catch. Here's (I think) a proper fix. This assumes that if
>>(values[i] != NULL), the datum is the output of the appropriate "in"
>>function, otherwise the datum is NULL. It saves the extra pass through
>>the dvalues array too.
>>
>>I thought you might want to try it out now without waiting for the patch
>>to get into cvs. I tested it with a contrived test function and it
>>worked as desired.
>
>
> Great, seems to work fine here. Thanks for fixing that for me.
>

Here is a patch for the Table Function API. It fixes a bug found by Neil
Conway (BuildTupleFromCStrings sets NULL for pass-by-value types when
intended value is 0). It also implements some other improvements
suggested by Neil.

If there are no objections, please apply.

Thanks,

Joe