| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Murtagh <christopher(dot)murtagh(at)mcgill(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs Postgres |
| Date: | 2002-07-08 21:26:29 |
| Message-ID: | 3D2A0385.8020109@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Christopher Murtagh wrote:
> First off, Joshua, great book, it has saved me a lot of head scratching.
>Thanks.
>
>
Thanks :) but I am not sure what the rest of this message is in
reference to. :)
> Secondly, since the ancestor is Ingres (and not IngreSQL) and the name is
>a play on *Post* Ingres... and the default user (that I've always created
>anyway) is Postgres... to me Postgres is the clear winner. Besides,
>whenever I mention 'Postgres' to anyone (accent in the first syllable),
>they've always known what I was talking about.
>
> Anyway, just my $0.02.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Chris
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Seidman | 2002-07-08 21:33:40 | Re: Null in the where-clause |
| Previous Message | Thomas F. O'Connell | 2002-07-08 21:03:47 | 7.2.2? |