From: | Ignacio Coloma <icoloma-lists(at)iverdino(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mirco D'Angelo <dangelo(at)isic(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: newbie question |
Date: | 2002-07-08 20:28:05 |
Message-ID: | 3D29F5D5.4040109@iverdino.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Transactions (well, recently mysql allows them but using propietary
extensions), foreign key relationships, subqueries, stored
procedures/triggers. MySQL lacks all of these.
On the other side, postgres is only ported on *nix platforms, but you
can put cygwin/cygipc on Windows, if that is the case. And mysql is
"friendlier", that means wrong column value types (INT_VALUE = '5') and
double quotes working as simple quotes, so it's easier to start with.
As far as I can remember.
Mirco D'Angelo wrote:
>Hi
>
>I am going to learn MySql 'cause I have to, but would it be better, or let's
>say, more interesting, to learn postgressql? Is it newer, more common, etc.?
>
>greets
>mirco
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sandy Ear | 2002-07-08 22:45:01 | PLPGSQL language documentation |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-08 18:40:39 | Re: |