| From: | Patrick Macdonald <patrickm(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | tony <tony(at)animaproductions(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, postgres list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: read this and puke |
| Date: | 2002-06-14 19:04:23 |
| Message-ID: | 3D0A3E37.A5126AD5@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
tony wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2002-06-14 at 16:47, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>
> > submitted to CVS. Without support it has a little chance go to the
> > end user. We need commercial companies around PostgreSQL. But after
> > GreatBridge it's unlikely to happen. I hoped Redhat would do something,
> > but I don't see any movement.
>
> RedHat makes more money from Oracle than from PostgreSQL. Don't expect
> anything from them. Right RedHat guys?
Yes and no...
Yes, Red Hat makes money from Oracle.
and
No, you should expect something from Red Hat but not direct
marketing support. Red Hat markets its own database
distribution, Red Hat Database, which is powered by PostgreSQL.
This fact is clearly stated on all RHDB marketing literature.
What you should expect is that modifications made to PostgreSQL
proper to support the direction of RHDB be made available to the
community (a current example being SQL schemas).
Cheers,
Patrick
--
Patrick Macdonald
Red Hat Database Development
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2002-06-14 19:07:31 | Possible feature |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2002-06-14 18:58:31 | help on qouteing in plpgsql function |