From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | SERFIOTIs gewrgios <serfioti(at)csd(dot)uoc(dot)gr> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Acquiring views |
Date: | 2002-06-13 17:43:13 |
Message-ID: | 3D08D9B1.3090806@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
I was using the latest development version as well as the 7.2 version.
Since the 7.2 version is backwardly compatible with a 7.1 database, go
to jdbc.postgresql.org and download the 7.2 version and give it a try.
--Barry
SERFIOTIs gewrgios wrote:
> I'm using version 7.1.3 Which is the one you're using?
>
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Barry Lind wrote:
>
>
>>What version of the driver are you using? I am unable to reproduce the
>>problem with the latest driver.
>>
>>--Barry
>>
>>SERFIOTIs gewrgios wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>> i'm using the function getTables() of interface DatabaseMetaData
>>>trying to obtain the names of the views which are defined in the database.
>>>However, although it works with an Oracle Database, it doesn't work in a
>>>Postgresql Database.
>>>The exact statement i'm using is the following:
>>>String types[] = new String[1];
>>>types[0] = new String("VIEW");
>>>ResultSet rs = this.dbmd.getTables(null, null, null, types);
>>>
>>>The result is that I get java.lang.NullPointerException at the last line,
>>>although I do have a view declared!
>>>
>>>When I'm using: types[0] = new String("TABLE") instead it works fine. Is
>>>there a problem between what PostgreSQL considers a view, and what JDBC
>>>considers a view?
>>>
>>>Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>>> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Floyd Shackelford | 2002-06-13 17:58:37 | NullPointerExceptions in empty ResultSets |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2002-06-13 17:10:46 | Re: |