From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Robert Norris <srn(at)commsecure(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to cripple a postgres server |
Date: | 2002-05-28 12:26:29 |
Message-ID: | 3CF37775.6DD8CBE1@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Stephen,
Are you able to give some detailed technical specs of the hardware
you're running?
I consider yours to be a higher-end PostgreSQL server, and I'd like to
have a good practical understanding of what is required (hardware wise)
to put together a 1k/second transaction PostgreSQL server.
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
<snip>
> I'm not sure; it can certainly do >1k queries/second through 800
> simultaneous connections (about 1/connection second), but it's hard to
> find enough machines to load it up that much...
>
> One big difference, though, is that with the vacuum problem, the CPU
> used is almost all (99%) system time; loading up the db with lots of
> queries increases user time mostly, with little system time...
>
> In any event, it seems a bug that merely having connections open causes
> this problem! They aren't even in transactions...
>
> Stephen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: signature.asc
> signature.asc Type: PGP Armored File (application/x-unknown-content-type-PGP Armored File)
> Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2002-05-28 13:00:17 | Re: [meta] news.postgresql.org still down - who do I |
Previous Message | terry | 2002-05-28 11:28:52 | Re: replication, availability of my server |