From: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Issues tangential to win32 support |
Date: | 2002-05-09 21:56:01 |
Message-ID: | 3CDAF071.CF3DAB58@mohawksoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dann Corbit wrote:
> Our package avoids Cygwin altogether. We wrote our own POSIX layer from
> scratch, and we junked fork() for CreateProcess() {and inserted copious:
> #ifdef ICKY_WIN32_KLUDGE
> /* our code goes here */
> #else
> /* Standard UNIX code goes here */
> #endif
OK, what sorts of things did you do in your ICKY_WIN32_KLUDGE? Were they ever
migrated back into the main tree? Did you simulate fork() or a stand-alone?
I know Windows very well, but I have thus far remained ignorant of PostgreSQL
internals.
>
> It's complete, and it performs like the burning blue blazes. We have
> run the full PostgreSQL test suite to completion with success. However,
> before we release any SQL tool, we have our own test suite with tens of
> thousands of tests to perform. Hence, we won't have a release until
> June at the earliest.
>
> I think the Japanese one also does not use Cygwin (but I have not tried
> installing it yet).
The japanese site claims cygwin.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2002-05-09 22:10:43 | Re: Issues tangential to win32 support |
Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2002-05-09 21:51:50 | Re: Issues tangential to win32 support |