From: | Steve Wampler <swampler(at)noao(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |
Date: | 2002-05-09 17:29:29 |
Message-ID: | 3CDAB1F9.676B0D6C@noao.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Browne wrote:
>
> If "fixing" PostgreSQL to "work" on Win32 caused a whole lot of
> breakage on the Unix side, that would _not_ be a "win." It might
> do well on Win32, but breakage could lead to a LOSS of interest
> on Unix, as people decided to take the point of view that the
> developers considered it more important to toady to Win-Needs
> than to improve how it works on Unix.
As a PostgreSQL user, I *wholeheartedly* agree. I have no need nor
interest in a Win32 solution. Period. If I perceive that an effort
to add a Win32 postgresql is adversely impacting the ongoing
development of Unix-based PostgreSQL then I will start looking at
other solutions.
In fact, if you folks could find additional resources that would
support Win32 development, it still seems to me that perhaps those
resources could be better spent improving the Unix version.
--
Steve Wampler -- swampler(at)noao(dot)edu
O sibile, si ergo. Fortibus es enaro.
Nobile, demis trux. Demis phulla causan dux.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-05-09 17:33:58 | Re: pgaccess |
Previous Message | mlw | 2002-05-09 17:24:03 | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |