Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
Date: 2002-05-08 16:10:44
Message-ID: 3CD94E04.AF837261@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

...
> As near as I can tell, we *could* develop a self-contained installation
> package for PG+cygwin without any licensing problem.

Right. That was my opinion also. But istm that however the discussion
settles out, there is a path to success.

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Koizar 2002-05-08 16:19:18 Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader
Previous Message mlw 2002-05-08 16:00:18 Re: postgresql 7.1 file descriptor