Re: What popular, large commercial websites run

From: Grant Johnson <grant(at)amadensor(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)townnews(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What popular, large commercial websites run
Date: 2002-05-02 21:44:01
Message-ID: 3CD1B321.5020407@amadensor.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
>
>
>So I have no reason to think that insert/update is measurably slower
>in this scheme than before, and some reasons to think it may often be
>faster. I have not tried to benchmark the speed of insert/update taken
>in isolation, though.
>
It has been my experience that inserts/updates are FASTER when there is
some free space in the db from deleted records.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2002-05-02 21:45:18 Re: making a trigger to a system call to a shell script
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2002-05-02 21:18:15 bool / vacuum full bug.