Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > What are you expecting for psql e.g. the following
> > > > wrong(?) example ?
> > > >
> > > > [The curren schema is schema1]
> > > > begin;
> > > > create schema foo;
> > > > set search_path = foo;
> > > > create table t1 (....); [error occurs]
> > > > commit;
> > > > insert into t1 select * from schema1.t1;
> > >
> > > I am expecting the INSERT will use the search_path value that existed
> > > before the error transaction began.
> > >
> >
> > So you see foo.t1 which is a copy of schema1.t1
> > if all were successful and you may be able to see
> > the doubled schema1.t1 in case of errors.
>
> Yes, I think that is how it would behave. If you don't roll back 'set
> search_path', you are pointing to a non-existant schema.

OK I see your standpoint. If Tom agrees with Bruce I don't
object any more.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue