| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction |
| Date: | 2002-04-25 02:08:51 |
| Message-ID: | 3CC76533.4ABCD53C@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > Must I understand this from your previous posting
> > (2 says roll back only after transaction aborts,)
> > or original posting ? What I understood was 2 only
> > says that SET fails between a failure and the
> > subsequenct ROLLBACK call.
>
> Yes, 2 says that SET fails between failure query and COMMIT/ROLLBACK
> call, which is current behavior.
Oh I see. It was my mistake to have participated this vote.
I'm not qualified from the first because I wasn't able to
understand your vote list.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Loftis | 2002-04-25 02:08:56 | Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-04-25 02:07:27 | referential integrity problem |