Re: Patches applied; initdb time!

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patches applied; initdb time!
Date: 2002-04-21 22:35:47
Message-ID: 3CC33EC3.7040803@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>>FWIW, I'm still seeing:
>>gram.y:99: warning: `set_name_needs_quotes' declared `static' but never
>>defined
>
>
> Ack. Sloppy patching. Should be fixed now...
>
> - Thomas

Yup, did the trick.

Thanks,

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-04-21 22:36:49 Re: Patches applied; initdb time!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-21 22:11:05 Re: Patches applied; initdb time!

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-04-21 22:36:49 Re: Patches applied; initdb time!
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-04-21 22:32:30 Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...)