| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patches applied; initdb time! |
| Date: | 2002-04-21 21:37:18 |
| Message-ID: | 3CC3310E.2000604@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>
>>but did *not* get the INT64CONST warning that Tom did. I'm using an
>>updated Red Hat 7.2 box.
>
>
> Probably it depends on compiler version? I'm using gcc 2.95.3.
>
could be:
[postgres(at)jec-linux pgsql]$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98)
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-04-21 21:47:08 | Re: Patches applied; initdb time! |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-21 21:33:16 | Re: Patches applied; initdb time! |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-04-21 21:47:08 | Re: Patches applied; initdb time! |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-04-21 21:37:03 | pgsql/src/backend commands/variable.c parser/g ... |