From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patches applied; initdb time! |
Date: | 2002-04-21 21:14:52 |
Message-ID: | 3CC32BCC.4090409@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>>With fairly vanilla configure options, I get...
>
>
> Please be specific on the options and platform. I do *not* see these
> warnings here with my "fairly vanilla configure options" ;)
>
> Can't fix what I can't see, and we should track down what interactions
> are happening to get these variables exposed...
>
> btw, the INT64CONST must be defined for int8 (which is where I get the
> definition for the date/time stuff); not sure why it appears in two
> separate places and not sure why my compiler (gcc-2.96.xxx) does not
> notice it.
>
I just built from cvs tip using:
./configure --enable-integer-datetimes --enable-locale --enable-debug
--enable-cassert --enable-multibyte --enable-syslog --enable-nls
--enable-depend
and got:
gram.y:6688: warning: `set_name_needs_quotes' defined but not used
variable.c: In function `parse_datestyle':
variable.c:262: warning: `rstat' might be used uninitialized in this
function
variable.c:264: warning: `value' might be used uninitialized in this
function
-- and the usual lexer related warnings --
pgc.c: In function `yylex':
pgc.c:1249: warning: label `find_rule' defined but not used
pgc.l: At top level:
pgc.c:3073: warning: `yy_flex_realloc' defined but not used
and
pl_scan.c: In function `plpgsql_base_yylex':
pl_scan.c:1020: warning: label `find_rule' defined but not used
scan.l: At top level:
pl_scan.c:2321: warning: `yy_flex_realloc' defined but not used
but did *not* get the INT64CONST warning that Tom did. I'm using an
updated Red Hat 7.2 box.
HTH,
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-21 21:22:47 | Re: Patches applied; initdb time! |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-21 21:13:11 | Re: Patches applied; initdb time! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-21 21:22:47 | Re: Patches applied; initdb time! |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-21 21:13:11 | Re: Patches applied; initdb time! |