Re: more about pg_toast growth

From: Richard A Lough <ralough(dot)ced(at)dnet(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more about pg_toast growth
Date: 2002-04-10 06:59:53
Message-ID: 3CB3E2E9.42117939@dnet.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 12:26:38PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > Surely I'd be willing to learn how to tune Pg, since I've staked my
> > operation on it. But, "max_fsm_pages" produces fewer pages on Google
> > than "deep fried orangutan pancreas", and I do not often have the time
> > to leaf through 460,000 lines of source. Some documentation would be
> > swell.
>
> In case anything thinks he's kidding, he's not. max_fsm_pages produces a
> total of 5 hits. 1 under runtime configuration for 7.3devel docs (which is
> interesting since it's not runtime configurable). 1 in the postgreql.conf
> sample file.
>

I'd be interested in trying to reproduce the problem. I'm trying to put
some figures together on how postgres uses disk space.

Unless I've missed something, there isn't anything in the earlier thread
on whether the table gets dropped anytime, or whether the records get
changed by INSERT's or whatever.

TIA

Richard A Lough

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre-Alexis Paquin 2002-04-10 08:06:19 Postgresql installation problem
Previous Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2002-04-10 05:30:25 Who's using PostgreSQL? (thanks)