| From: | Jeff Trout <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mikael Carneholm <Mikael(dot)Carneholm(at)WirelessCar(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Plans for 8.2? |
| Date: | 2006-01-12 18:58:12 |
| Message-ID: | 3CB22A28-ECDE-49BB-8316-DA144075B0E7@torgo.978.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Jan 12, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> "Built In" Failover/Clustering
>>> This won't happen. The community stance, which is a good one is
>>> that no single replication solutions fits everyone's needs and
>>> therefore we rely out the outside
>>> sources. Slony-I, Mammoth Replicator and pgpool being the most
>>> popular.
>> Too bad - I think that will keep a lot of potential users from
>> evaluating Pg as a serious alternative. Good or bad, decide for
>> yourself :)
>
Isn't the [expensive db name here]'s replication/failover just an
expensive addon?
As in if you don't pay for it you don't get it.
So we're basically in the same boat as them.. just an add on. we just
offer more variety.
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-01-12 19:09:30 | Re: MAX without FROM |
| Previous Message | Angshu Kar | 2006-01-12 18:58:11 | MAX without FROM |