From: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? |
Date: | 2002-04-08 16:09:21 |
Message-ID: | 3CB1C0B1.CB7BC99C@redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> > You misunderstood what I've said. You may have how many schemas
> > you please. But you will have to refer to their objects specifying
> > the schema name explicitly. The only cases where you can omit the
> > schema name are (accordingly to the SQL'99 standard):
>
> Please tell me where's the description in SQL99 ?
> I wasn't able to find it unfortunately.
>
As most things in the SQL standard, you have to collect information
from several places and add it together.
Look at 4.20, 11.1 and specially at the rules for
<schema qualified name>.
Then think a little bit about scenarios, trying to apply the rules.
It is a pain, but there is no other way.
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-08 16:27:32 | Re: timeout implementation issues |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-08 16:07:04 | Re: timeout implementation issues |