Re: What's the CURRENT schema ?

From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What's the CURRENT schema ?
Date: 2002-04-04 20:27:58
Message-ID: 3CACB74E.890FE0C2@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I suppose it's a judgment call which is uglier. Thoughts?
>

Well, PUBLIC is an SQL reserved keyword (pre-92). We are
already very liberal with keywords. I would leave PUBLIC alone.

I does not _have_ to be "public", so we can just avoid the issue
by adding a pg_ prefix to public, common or something else.
It is a PostgreSQL concept anyway.

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-04 20:28:50 Re: What's the CURRENT schema ?
Previous Message Fernando Nasser 2002-04-04 20:19:20 Re: What's the CURRENT schema ?