Re: Bad timestamp external representation '2001-05-11

From: Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: samuele(dot)brignoli(at)darpha(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bad timestamp external representation '2001-05-11
Date: 2002-03-20 16:04:39
Message-ID: 3C98B317.CA23D9F6@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> ERROR: Bad timestamp external representation '2001-05-11 00.00.00'
> Is this dot notation of date time not supported? I cannot change directly my
> inserton query, so is there a way to enable this notation ( maybe
> configuring locale ? ) ?

Hmm. This is the first report I've had (or at least that I can recall)
of using dot notation for time fields. PostgreSQL recognizes dots for
year/month/day fields.

It will require some source code changes to make this work for you. *OR*
you should use to_date() to read in the data, which seems a much better
choice ;) When you said that you cannot change the insertion query, do
you mean that you cannot change the query itself, or cannot change the
data going into the query? You've *got* to have some control over one or
the other, right?

Where are you located? Is this a common notation in that part of the
world?

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-20 16:09:25 Re: Al Dev and Postgresql book
Previous Message Ian Harding 2002-03-20 16:03:52 Re: Auomatic numbering, replacing nulls and IF