Re: timestamp_part() bug?

From: Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Domingo Alvarez Duarte <domingo(at)dad-it(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp_part() bug?
Date: 2002-03-15 16:19:15
Message-ID: 3C921F03.65920CE0@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> There is a problem with epoch as well that was not in the 7.1.3
> 7.1.3# select extract(epoch from '00:00:34'::time), now();
> 7.1.3# 34 2002-03-05 22:13:16 +01
> Is that a bug or I didn't understand the new date/time types ?

Looks like a bug (or at least it looks like it behaves differently than
I would expect). Thanks for the report; I'll look at it asap.

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-15 16:27:13 Re: psql and output from \?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-15 16:03:50 Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec