| From: | Bruce Badger <bbadger(at)BadgerSE(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Beating Oracle |
| Date: | 2002-03-07 22:14:08 |
| Message-ID: | 3C87E630.3010000@BadgerSE.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Thanks for that. I have passed the all the comments from the list back
to the people with the problem. I'll pass your tcpdump suggestion on
too. I'll post the outcome when I hear what it is.
Thanks to you all.
anil wrote:
>what is your tcpdump looks like? I have been using Pgsql for about five years.
>I have not seen something like that. If you do have stateful firewall, may be
>it does not keep state for port 5432.
> I could be wrong. just a thought.
>
>anil
>
>anil
>
>Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Bruce Badger <bbadger(at)BadgerSE(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>>The thing is that from their point of view, Oracle keeps going where
>>>PostgreSQL does not. Given that both are running over the same network,
>>>the response of these people could well be to simply move everything to
>>>Oracle.
>>>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nicolas Bazin | 2002-03-08 07:35:18 | Additional fixes to ecpg - please apply patch |
| Previous Message | Mark Johannessen | 2002-03-07 21:23:16 | pgsql_perl5-1.9.0 install problem |