Re: Postgresql backend to perform vacuum automatically

From: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nicolas Bazin <nbazin(at)ingenico(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql backend to perform vacuum automatically
Date: 2002-03-06 12:12:09
Message-ID: 3C860799.26E231CB@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
>
> > > > > If they do not affect performance, then why have them off?
> > > >
> > > > I think Jan said 2-3%. If we can get autovacuum from it, it would be a
> > > > win to keep it on all the time, perhaps.
> > >
> > > Assuming that the statistics get updated:
> > >
> > > How often should the sats table be queried?
> > > What sort of configurability would be needed?
> >
> > You could wake up every few minutes and see how the values have changed.
> > I don't remember if there is a way to clear that stats so you can see
> > just the changes in the past five minutes. Vacuum the table that had
> > activity.
>
> I cannot envision querying the stats every 4 seconds, especially if the stats
> thread already has most of the info in hand.
>
> I still think, that for best results the vacuums should happen continuously
> for single pages based on a hook in wal or the buffer manager. Do I remember
> correctly, that the active page (the one receiving the next row) already has
> a strategy for slot reuse ? Maybe this strategy should be the followed more
> aggressively ?
>
> Seems the worst case is a few row table that permanently get updated,
> it should be possible to harness this situation with above method.

Perhaps the statistics thread can trigger a semaphore when it sees that vacuum
needs to be run?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2002-03-06 12:59:56 Re: Rep: [BUGS] Encoding Problem?
Previous Message Dalibor Andzakovic 2002-03-06 09:59:19 Re: Drop in performance for each INSERT/DELETE combo