| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] new hash function |
| Date: | 2002-03-05 13:44:47 |
| Message-ID: | 3C84CBCF.4862CD9F@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
...
> In my tests, this improves the performance of hash indexes by between 4%
> and 8%; the performance when using btree indexes or seqscans is
> basically unchanged.
That's great! Picking up 5% performance is not something we do every
day...
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-03-05 14:02:47 | Re: Storage Location Patch Proposal for V7.3 |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-03-05 13:10:50 | Re: Cache invalidation notification (was: Database Caching) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-05 16:17:16 | Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2002-03-05 10:21:58 | Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY |